Topic Last Modified: 2011-05-11
A critical exercise in the planning and deployment of Microsoft SQL Server 2005, Microsoft SQL Server 2008, or Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 for your Microsoft Lync Server 2010, Enterprise Edition is the placement of data and log files onto physical hard disks for performance. The most critical files for performance are the Rtcdyn log and the Rtc log. Placing these files on their own hard disk or redundant array of independent disks (RAID) set is the optimal scenario. The database files and what they are responsible for is detailed in the following table.
Data and Log Files for Central Management Store
Central Management store database files | Data file or log purpose |
---|---|
Xds.ldf |
Transaction log file for the Central Management store |
Xds.mdf |
Maintains the configuration of the current Lync Server 2010 topology, as defined and published by Topology Builder |
Lis.mdf |
Location Information service data file |
Lis.ldf |
Transaction log for the Location Information service data file |
Data and Log files for User, Conferencing, and Address Book
Core Lync Server 2010 database files | Data file or log purpose |
---|---|
Rtcdyn.mdf |
Maintains transient user data (presence runtime data) |
Rtcdyn.ldf |
Transaction log for Rtcdyn data |
Rtc.mdf |
Persistent user data (for example, access control lists (ACLs), contacts, Standard Edition server or Enterprise Edition Front End pool, scheduled conferences) |
Rtc.ldf |
Transaction log for Rtc data |
Rtcab.mdf |
Real-time communications (RTC) address book database is the SQL Server repository where Address Book service information is stored |
Rtcab.ldf |
Transaction log for Address Book Service |
Rtcab1.mdf |
Real-time communications address book database is the SQL Server repository where Address Book service information is stored. (Secondary copy for performance) |
Rtcab1.ldf |
Transaction log for Address Book service |
Data and Log Files for Call Park and Response Group
Application database | Data file or log purpose |
---|---|
Cpsdyn.mdf |
Dynamic information database for the Call Park application |
Cpsdyn.ldf |
Transaction log for Call Park application data file |
Rgsconfig.mdf |
Lync Server Response Group service data file for the configuration of the services |
Rgsconfig.ldf |
Transaction log file for the Response Group application configuration |
Rgsdyn.mdf |
Response Group service data file for runtime operations |
Rgsdyn.ldf |
Transaction log for the Response Group service runtime data file |
Data and Log Files for Archiving and Monitoring Server
Archiving and Monitoring database files | Data file or log purpose |
---|---|
LcsCdr.mdf |
Data store for the call detail recording (CDR) process of the Monitoring Server |
LcsCdr.ldf |
Transaction log for call detail recording (CDR) data |
QoEMetrics.mdf |
Quality of Experience data file stored from the Monitoring Server |
QoEMetrics.ldf |
Transaction log for Monitoring data |
Lcslog.mdf |
Data file for the retention of instant messaging and conferencing data on an Archiving Server |
Lcslog.ldf |
Transaction log for Archiving data |
In this topic, references are made to disk and to RAID set. Note that in the configuration of SQL Server resources, referring to a disk means a single hardware device. A hard disk drive with two partitions, one holding log files and the other partition holding data files, is not the same as two disks, each dedicated to either log or data files.
In reference to RAID sets, there are a number of different RAID technologies from various vendors. And, with the proliferation of storage area networks (SAN), RAID sets dedicated to a single system are rarer. You should consult with your RAID or SAN vendor to determine what the best configuration is for your disk layout when configuring for SQL Server performance with Lync Server 2010.
Note also that not all disk drives are created equally; some perform better than others. Even drives from the same manufacturer can vary in performance because of rotational speed, hardware cache size, and other factors. It is advisable that you test your disks to determine the better performing disks, and then place the more critical and speed sensitive log and data files – specifically, Rtcdyn log and Rtc log – onto the better performing disks.
Disk and Database File Distribution
There are a number of potential solutions for the placement of the files. Each of the possible combinations has pros and cons. The optimal distribution requires six hard disks or distinct RAID sets. We recommend that the two most active files, the Rtcdyn log file and Rtc log file, should always be placed on their own disks or RAID set.
Six-Disk Distribution
The distribution scenario using six disks is typically only used in cases where you want to collocate the Archiving and Monitoring databases on the same SQL Server. This solution uses six physical disks or dedicated RAID sets. The distribution of the data and log files is shown in the following diagram.
Advantages – Very high performing, low latency, and little contention for disk I/O when compared to other solutions.
Disadvantage – More costly than other solutions. At minimum, you require six hard disks.
Five-Disk Distribution
The five-disk distribution uses five disks or five RAID sets. The Rtcdyn and Rtc log files are separated onto their own disks. Archiving and Monitoring logs and data are placed onto their own disks, respectively. The remaining log files and data files are placed on the fifth disk.
Advantages – Provides good performance for the Rtcdyn and Rtc log files, while reducing the overall number of disks required.
Disadvantages – All other log files are located on a single disk, potentially causing I/O performance latency for other workloads. Impact is minimized if the Archiving Server, the Monitoring Server, or both are not deployed.
Four-Disk Distribution
The four-disk distribution uses four disks or four RAID sets. This configuration is considered to be the best performing of the recommendations due to the low latency and low contention for disk I/O resources. The Rtcdyn and Rtc log files are separated onto their own disks. The remaining log files are placed on the third disk, while the data files are placed on the fourth.
Advantages – Provides good performance for the Rtcdyn and Rtc log files, while reducing the overall number of disks required.
Disadvantages – All other log files are located on a single disk, potentially causing I/O performance latency for other workloads. Impact is minimized if the Archiving Server, the Monitoring Server, or both are not deployed.
Three-Disk Distribution
The Three Disk Distribution uses three disks or RAID sets. The Rtcdyn and Rtc log files are placed on drive one and drive two. The remaining log and data files are placed on disk three.
Advantages – Less costly than six and four disk solutions. Placing the Rtcdyn and Rtc log files on their own hard disks allows for good performance for the frequently updated transaction log files.
Disadvantages – All other log and data files are placed on the remaining disk. Increased potential for latency due to increased I/O of all other workloads on the single disk. If Monitoring and Archiving are not deployed, the impact is lessened, but performance impact is still a concern.
Two-Disk Distribution
Two-disk distribution uses two hard disks or RAID sets. The Rtcdyn and Rtc log files are both placed on the first disk. All other log and data files are placed on the second hard disk.
Advantages – Lowering of cost is the primary advantage. Log and data files for other workloads on the second disk will lessen the overall impact on the Rtcdyn and Rtc log files.
Disadvantages – Combining the Rtcdyn and Rtc log files will begin to negatively impact performance.
Single-Disk Distribution
The single-disk distribution uses a single hard disk or RAID set. The Rtcdyn and Rtc log files are placed on the single disk along with the other log and data files.
Advantages – significantly lower cost than other solutions. Small user numbers may be able to experience acceptable performance.
Disadvantages – Disk latency and disk loading from all workload logs and data files on the single disk will have an impact on performance. Deployment of Monitoring and Archiving roles will impact performance further.